Please support Anime OTK, who hosts this wiki, by making a donation.
User talk:Roguebfl/2006
From Spanking Art
Contents |
[edit] Welcome
Welcome to the spanking art wiki, and thank you very much for your contributiosn here. I hope you continue to add to this wiki. -Mercy (talk) 14:56, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- And welcome from me as well Anonyq2005 18:12, 6 June 2006
[edit] Image:Differnt uniforms.gif
There is no source or release information for this image. Where did it come from? Who holds the copyright? has it been released under the GFDL, or put into the Public domain? If not, why are we allowed to use it here. Please provide this information or we will reluctantlty have to delete this very nice image. -Mercy (talk) 14:57, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
- No it a Screen Capture from an Episode of Detecitve Conan, Taken "fair use" Commetary as the Scene was comparing the different uniforms. -Rogue (talk) 10:22, June 6 2006 (CST)
- From Spanking Art talk:Image use policy: Currently this wiki does not permit images under non-free licenses, and does not permit images which can only be sued by virtue of a claim of"Fair use". This generally means that movie clips and stills, comics, and commercially published images first published in 1964 or later cannot be used, and such images published betweeen 1924 and 1963 can only be used if it can be determined that the copyright was not renewed, which is non-trivial. See also Spanking Art:Image use policy
- I must also point out that even if we allowed images used by virtue of Fair Use on this wiki, this claim is rather weak. The articel in which you used the iamge was not a discussion of "Detecitve Conan", nor of such programs in general. Even on wikipedia, where fair use images are allowed thsi might well eb a problem. Also, for a fair use claim to be reasonable, the iamge must by properly credited.
- The image is a nice one, but I am afarid it doesn't fit thsi wiki's policy. That policy can be changed -- the matter has been discused on Spanking Art talk:Image use policy, and you could present argumetns for changign it there. But please read the arguemtns already made first, if you want to propose a change. -Mercy (talk) 15:48, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] user vs talk page
I'm sorry, I clicked wrongly and left the message for you on your user page, instead of your user talk page. TYhe user talk page is the normal wiki place to leave a message for a user, while the user page is a place for the user to say soemthing about him or herself. I have now moved the variosu msssges here to correct my error. -Mercy (talk) 15:58, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] logo
Image:Wiki.png is our freely relased logo image. I have created a scaled-down version at Image:Wiki-31x88.PNG. Feel free to revise this or to work from the larger logo if you prefer. Both are freely released under the GFDL. -Mercy (talk) 16:45, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] See also
Thanks for your variuous contributions. Please keep on.
A minor note: when there is a link to another articel within the body of an article, we do not normally list the second article in the "See also" section. For example, there is a link to Parent in the body of Sibling. Therefore ther eis no need for Parent to be listed in the "See also" section of Sibling. This also means that when a link is added to the body of an article, it may be appropriate to remove a correspondign link from the see also section.
In some cases, where the reference seems particualrly important, and the link is a bit obscure (such as if it is in the middle of a long article or if it is piped so that it is not obvious what is being linked to), it may be desireable to retain a link in the "see also" section in spite of a matching link in the body of an article. -Mercy (talk) 15:51, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:A 656.jpg
"Palcomix has a free distrobute, but no alteration policy" Can you post a link to the precise terms of their policy, please? That will help, in determining the proper license tag to put on the image. -Mercy (talk) 15:43, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
